Daily news

 
Prisons in Bulgaria fail to meet human rights requirements
09:00 Mon 03 Apr 2006
 
Dinko Kanchev of Bulgarian Lawyers for Human Rights

“The main problem of Bulgarian prisons is that they are overcrowded. This inevitably leads to atrocities such as the one in the footage. The issue, however, is a contradictory one. When it comes to law and regulations there is no problem. Bulgaria has good laws in that field. The reality is something different. It is not news that the number of criminals has increased in the past 15 years. This logically  means that  more people are sent to prison. That is where the problem with overcrowded prisons comes in. Bulgaria simply does not have enough prison facilities to meet the ever-growing number of criminals.

A prison has not been built in the country since the 1920s and this alone is proof that the situation is bad. There are some cases where 12 people are sharing one prison cell meant for four people, which is unacceptable.

Bulgarian prisons do not meet the conditions defined by the United Nations. Bulgaria cannot even cover the minimum standards for such places. There is no doubt that authorities are trying to change the situation, but more consistent efforts are need to reach satisfying results.

According to Bulgarian criminal law, the punishment, in form of a sentence, is meant to socialise and reform the criminal. Whether this is possible under the present conditions is highly questionable.

Once in prison, a prisoner is involved in various programmes, such as work and individual activities. When the prisons are overcrowded, none of this can be achieved.

As one who has worked in that field for the past 15 years, I can say that it is not right that people who are sent to prison have access to mobile phones: this is a mistake of the system.

My personal opinion is that this incident of the footage showing sexual harassment is not isolated; atrocities exist in Bulgarian prisons. I have every reason to believe it. I worked in the system of criminal law during the days of communism and I can say that back then there were cases such as this. However, because of the system at that time, such cases were not given public attention. Today is a different story. My opinion is that this case received public attention only because of the technology that made it possible to be posted on the internet.

The questions we all can ask are: Where were the prison guards when the footage was shot? Why were prisoners allowed to communicate among themselves so freely? And, of course, how did the mobile phone arrive in the prisoners’ hands? It is obvious that there has been a lack of discipline and control.”

 
Printer friendly version
 
 
 
Comments
 
Comments by A - 15:50 06 Jul 2006
How can you criticize the human rights violations and the use of the cell phone in the same breath? Isn't it obvious that such abuses will continue if they are not brought to light by people not trying to protect the system? Greater transparency is the only way to make those in power take responsibility.
Comments by A - 15:50 06 Jul 2006
How can you criticize the human rights violations and the use of the cell phone in the same breath? Isn't it obvious that such abuses will continue if they are not brought to light by people not trying to protect the system? Greater transparency is the only way to make those in power take responsibility.
 
 
Custom Search
Free Daily News Alerts
BNB Fixing 01 Dec 2008
EUR1.2608USD
EUR0.7916GBP
EUR1.95583BGN
USD1.55126BGN
GBP2.32408BGN
 
 
 
 
Download first page