The concerns of ECAS about any extension of the safeguard clause to reintroduce border controls within Schengen were expressed in a statement onMay 9 2011. In a follow-up comment, ECAS stressed six reasons why the (European) Commission should hold back from making proposals which could create a dangerous precedent and undermine European citizens’ free movement rights.
ECAS is increasingly alarmed by the way decisions appear to be taken. At the European Council meeting of June 23 and 24, it was stated that "as a very last resort, in the framework of this mechanism, a safeguard clause could be introduced to allow the exceptional reintroduction of internal border controls in a truly critical situation where a Member State no longer able to comply with its obligations under the Schengen rules. Such a measure would be taken on the basis of specified objective criteria and a common assessment, for a strictly limited scope and period of time, taking into account the need to be able to react in urgent cases. This will not affect the rights of persons entitled to the freedom of movement under the Treaties. The Commission is invited to submit a proposal for such a mechanism in September."
The European Council, like the European Parliament, and in future one million citizens, can ask the Commission to make a legislative proposal, while the latter preserves the sole right of initiative. Where the legislative decision-making process is triggered in this way, should it follow exceptional procedures? That could be a recipe for maladministration.
Concerned about changes to Schengen being imposed in a top-down fashion, ECAS pointed out that free movement concerns citizens and a wide range of operators. Therefore, any suggested change should be subjected to the normal consultation procedure before proposals are made. "The Commission is strongly committed to carry out consultation with civil society – as enshrined in Article 11 and when preparing the respective legislative proposals, attention will be paid to do so by appropriate means," ECAS told Commissioner Malmström in a letter of June 22 2011.
Instead of following this up and launching a consultation process in which everyone has an opportunity to have their say, decision-making is apparently proceeding in the obscurity of leaks to privileged parties, claims and counterclaims about what the Commission is apparently about to propose. The Commission would do well to mark a pause for reflections and hear the voice of all interested parties.
Foreign Minister Nikolai Mladenov warns that a ‘no’ vote on September 22 could imperil Bulgarian support for Schengen reforms, while Interior Minister Tsvetan Tsvetanov calls for an objective decision and says the Netherlands could find itself isolated.
The International Press Institute condemns attacks on the offices of Turkish-language newspaper Zaman in Paris and in the German city of Cologne, allegedly carried out by supporters of the banned Kurdistan Workers' Party.
Sofia Echo Media is part of the Economedia Group.
The news and information content on this website is provided by our editorial team and is copyrighted.
Any unauthorised reproduction or use of it is strictly forbidden. Reproduction of this website's content is permitted only
with prior written permission from the Editor-in-Chief, should be propertly acredited and provide an active link back to our site.
Comments posted by the website's visitors are independent of the editorial materials and do not represent the views of sofiaecho.com.
Sofia Echo Media cannot be held responsible for the statements contained in visitor comments.
The percentаge change in the shares' prices are based on the price of the last transaction of the current session compared to the
price of the last transaction of the previous session. Bulgarian Stock Exchange data is not real-time, but updated every 15 minutes,
and should not be used as a basis for decisions about buying or selling stock options.