Sat, May 26 2012
General view of deputies in the hemicycle during the vote to ban full-face veils worn by some Muslim women in public, at the national assembly in Paris, July 13 2010. French lawmakers voted to ban full-length veils in public places, putting France on the road to becoming the second European country to take steps to make wearing the burqa or niqab a criminal offence.
Bulgaria drawn into controversy about religious symbols
The French National Assembly is expected to spend the next two or three days debating the proposed legislation. A week ago, the European Parliament said it opposed laws prohibiting certain types of dress. Belgium is considering similar legislation to ban the burqa in public.
Issue of immigration is playing high in Dutch campaign, with far-right Dutch Freedom Party expected to finish in top three.
World leaders acknowledged Putin's victory with reservations, and international observers say the election was skewed in the former president's favour.
Hollande's call for more spending and economic growth has struck a chord with French voters.
Gallup International Association poll gives president Sarkisian’s party 44 per cent, while three main challengers alleged ‘machinations’ by ruling party in what – in contrast to 2008 – reportedly was a largely peaceful election.
The Freedom House report says the media environment in the Middle East and North Africa underwent major improvements in 2011, but remained the worst-performing part of the world.
Dissatisfaction with jobs is a global phenomenon and two-thirds of workers all over the world intend to look for another job in the near future, the survey concluded.
Cosmos is correct mentioning that
it is men who impose on women their dressing more the Fundamentalism and strictness in
dressing are directly proportional.
Am I correct in saying that it is the men that make the women dress like they do in Islamic country.Is it not true that at this moment in Iran that the women are starting to dress the way they want to.But as I said I would abide by the law in any country I vist this shows respect, If it was ramadan I would drink a glass of water at my hotel to show respect
On a lighter side some women need to be fully clothed in tents.
This comment has been removed by the moderator because it contained foul, abusive or discriminating language
To Cosmos: Yes, you would abide by their law. If you drink a glass of water in the street in daylightdrring Ramadan you can go to prison. Still, in most countries a woman can wear 'provocative ' clothing and people can drink alcohol in bars. So they do 'accommodate' foreigners.
I still cannot understand why the fine for force goes to the government and not the victim.
Well done to France.I fully agree with this initiative and i believe that the rest of EU must follow suit.
Never understood what the big deal was. 2000 burkas in France!
In Holland, most women who dress in a tent are not Turks or Moroccans, but hysterical Dutch ....s who went over to Islam, often after having made the round of Pentecostals, Bagwan, and Shiva knows what. The only burka I have seen in Holland was on a bike, one hand at the handlebar and the other balancing a bag of groceries on the packrack...No Turk can do that.
If I went to an Islamic country I would abide by there law and respect it.If Muslims go to a western country they should abide by the law in that country and respect it.
so whats the problem.
If a husband verbally abuses his wife- for example breaks her arm,
is he by law required to pay her a similar fine that will now be imposed for forcing her to fully cover and to go to prison for one or two years. I do not know if this exists in French law, but I think it needs to be consistent with the law they are now passing.The mind boggles at the thought of the global community imposing fines and prison sentences such as the new French law when women are violated Women have told me they [...]
Read the full comment cover so men will not be desirous of them. Others have tod me that their husbands force them. The issue is complicated but one thing is not; let men and women pay the penalty for violating the other.
there was no need to wear it in the first place,it's simply another form of insecurity thus gathering around a "same thinking group"time to grow up and be responsible for our lives without these tribal accessories.