Thirty-one years ago Sweden banned corporal punishment, and became the first country to forbid all forms of violence against children, including at home. Since then a majority of the 47 Council of Europe member states have followed suit and committed themselves to putting an end to all corporal punishment.
Yet, after years of discussion, legislation, education on the subject and research showing the damaging effects of corporal punishment, it is still seen in many places as perfectly normal to hit a child.
The idea of punishing children this way reflects an old fear of losing control over the child. I have often been asked how one is supposed to make children obey if one can not hit them. The answer is: with words.
We should not teach children that it is acceptable to "resolve" disagreements with violence. Instead they should be taught by example to listen and discuss. Living under a constant threat of violence is detrimental for a growing and developing young person. As a matter of fact, research shows that children who are spanked more frequently at age three are more likely to be aggressive by age five.
There are three central arguments that summarise why we should not allow children to be beaten:
* It is a human rights and a legal imperative. Council of Europe norms as well as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child require that the child should be protected from all forms of physical or mental violence. * We react very strongly when an adult is beaten, and we would be thoroughly upset if a heated discussion ended with the opponent giving us a smack across the cheek. Why should it be acceptable for children to be hit – especially by someone they depend upon? This is illogical and inconsistent. * Corporal punishment is humiliating and represents an attack on the self esteem and self confidence of children. It demonstrates disrespect for their human dignity and teaches them that violence is an appropriate way to resolve a conflict.
Schools and teachers play important roles
The Swedish experience shows that a law against corporal punishment can change people’s behaviour. Thirty-one years ago this idea was quite controversial in Sweden, but after only two years, parents were well informed about the law, and there was a sharp decline in beatings.
The children themselves must also be aware of their rights – and here schools have an important role to play. Children who are informed of their rights can ask for help if they, or their friends, are being beaten. Children deserve a global, total ban against adults hitting them.
Thomas Hammarberg is the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights.
There is a difference between beating a child and a smack on the rear. I would like to see the statistics on how a child grows up never having any consequences. This is why we see parents struggling with their kids in public. The parents just sit there a say" Tommy stop yelling, leave that alone! And the kid continues because he is not afraid of any repercussion. This type of thinking is why the kids of today have no respect for anyone and think the world owes them everything.
To Jasper. What exactly is 'A good smack on the arse...' There is nothing 'good' about a smack. Also why do people who smack children do it on the 'arse' as opposed to, say, on the back of the legs? Is it to hide the marks left by the 'good slap'?
In the past most parents smacked, or beat, their children. Now we live in more enlightened times and we know that hitting/smacking is totally unnecessary as the example in Sweden shows.
Wow, it is amazing to see how far people will take this issue. Abuse and discipline are two totally different things. Spanking is not always for children and if some would do their homework, it only becomes harmful to a majority of children if they are spanked into their teen years.
I don't agree. A small, occasional, smack on the backside will not affect their self-worth. If it is done to often then that is wrong. If it is done as a last resort, and only sparingly, then I see nothing wrong with it.
Ask those who've raised children, what they think. Children are not adults, and comparing the reactions of adults to "beatings" is not valid. Children should not be beaten. It is still possible to give children good self esteem even though you smack them occasionally.
Thank you for standing up for human rights, Thomas Hammarberg. Property rights are also important, but children are not property. They are people, and they are tomorrow's adults.
A good smack on the arse never hurt a child and often got his attenion. You don't need to beat em senseless.
Follow yer Bible. Spare the rod, spoil ye child.
It is regrettable that such inhumane weapons are still used. It is high time that all European states ratify the Mine Ban Treaty and respect its provisions. The same goes for a prompt ratification of the new treaty banning cluster munitions, Hammarberg said.
With growing public concern and outcry from child protection groups, a group of Bulgaria's ruling party GERB MPs demand that the law is amended so that children will be barred from participating in reality television shows.
The question now is not whether we are in a new long-term bear or even whether we are back into the sideways channel of the last decade or so, but whether this is the beginning of a new bull market.
This comment has been removed by the moderator because it contained off-topic content
There is a difference between beating a child and a smack on the rear. I would like to see the statistics on how a child grows up never having any consequences. This is why we see parents struggling with their kids in public. The parents just sit there a say" Tommy stop yelling, leave that alone! And the kid continues because he is not afraid of any repercussion. This type of thinking is why the kids of today have no respect for anyone and think the world owes them everything.
To Jasper. What exactly is 'A good smack on the arse...' There is nothing 'good' about a smack. Also why do people who smack children do it on the 'arse' as opposed to, say, on the back of the legs? Is it to hide the marks left by the 'good slap'?
In the past most parents smacked, or beat, their children. Now we live in more enlightened times and we know that hitting/smacking is totally unnecessary as the example in Sweden shows.
Wow, it is amazing to see how far people will take this issue. Abuse and discipline are two totally different things. Spanking is not always for children and if some would do their homework, it only becomes harmful to a majority of children if they are spanked into their teen years.
I don't agree. A small, occasional, smack on the backside will not affect their self-worth. If it is done to often then that is wrong. If it is done as a last resort, and only sparingly, then I see nothing wrong with it.
Ask those who've raised children, what they think. Children are not adults, and comparing the reactions of adults to "beatings" is not valid. Children should not be beaten. It is still possible to give children good self esteem even though you smack them occasionally.
Thank you for standing up for human rights, Thomas Hammarberg. Property rights are also important, but children are not property. They are people, and they are tomorrow's adults.
A good smack on the arse never hurt a child and often got his attenion. You don't need to beat em senseless.
Follow yer Bible. Spare the rod, spoil ye child.
I fully agree with the author.
Corporal punishment and smacking are one of the causes of wife-beating.