advertisement
Sat, May 26 2012
The EC report on Bulgaria and the CVM: Highlights
The crime scene in Sofia after the January 2010 murder of former radio show host Bobbie Tsankov. The killing is mentioned in the March 23 report by the European Commission on Bulgaria's performance under the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism on justice and home affairs.
Photo: Georgi Kozhouharov
JUDICIAL REFORM AND THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION AND ORGANISED CRIME: STATE OF PLAY
During the last six months, Bulgaria has initiated several concrete proposals for reform which respond to recommendations made by the Commission: A partial revision of the Penal Procedure Code is currently under Parliamentary discussion and work is ongoing on a substantial reform of the Criminal Assets Forfeiture Act and on a revision of the Conflicts of Interest Law.
Bulgaria also decided to strengthen the structures of the prosecution in the fight against serious crime by using joint investigation teams for some priority cases involving high-level corruption and organised crime.
In addition, Bulgaria launched a structural reform of the National Revenue Agency and of the National Customs Agency and started to work on a comprehensive strategy to fight corruption and organised crime.
At the same time, the Inspectorate to the Supreme Judicial Council continued its good track record and the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) pursued the monitoring of cases of high public interest.
However, the judiciary continued to produce only few results in cases involving high-level corruption and organised crime and a further street killing occurred in January 2010.
Allegations of serious corruption related to senior appointments in the judiciary involving members of the SJC still need to be fully examined. A quicker and more complete administrative follow-up to the Commission's concerns regarding irregularities, conflict of interest and fraud in the implementation of EU funds needs to be implemented before the next assessment.
Benchmark 1: Adopt Constitutional amendments removing any ambiguity regarding the independence and accountability of the judicial system
The Inspectorate to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) continued to register a good track record of inspections.
The Inspectorate has conducted scheduled inspections of the whole Bulgarian judicial system with the exception of the Sofia Appellate
Region's civil branch. Although the Inspectorate's recommendations to courts and prosecutors' offices had not been consistently followed in all cases, the Inspectorate reported that the inspections produced overall a visible preventive effect among the magistrates.
The newly established joint working group of the SJC and the Inspectorate should contribute to the unification of disciplinary practice, assist in targeting inspections and in the application of inspection findings by the SJC to appraisal and appointment procedures.
Current practice shows that sanctions imposed by the SJC are often lenient. Some cases have also been dismissed due to the expiry of statutory deadlines.
Benchmark 2: Ensure a more transparent and efficient judicial process by adopting and implementing a new judicial system act and the new civil procedure code. Report on the impact of these new laws and of the penal and administrative procedure codes, notably on the pre- trial phase
In response to recommendations by the Commission, the government introduced several amendments to the Penal Procedure Code with a view to improving the efficiency and transparency of the judicial process. The debate in Parliament so far has shown that not all amendments may be supported.
Draft amendments to the Penal Code tabled by the Government aim to strengthen the sanctions for offences such as homicide, abduction and credit fraud.
Bulgaria provides a positive evaluation of the instrument of plea-bargaining which had led to increased judicial efficiency. On the other hand, the application of the expedited procedure had resulted in undue leniency in cases where the indictment was fully sustained by evidence.
As a result of the evaluation, the Bulgarian authorities consider excluding some serious criminal offences from the application of
the expedited procedure and aiming at limiting the court's ability to deliver judgments under the defined minimum.
No progress has been reported with procedures to adopt the new draft Statutory Instruments Act which should introduce clear rules for transparency and public debate and codify the different stages of the legislative process.
Benchmark 3: Continue the reform of the judiciary in order to enhance professionalism, accountability and efficiency. Evaluate the impact of this reform and publish the results annually
Appraisal of magistrates continued to be criticised as most magistrates were receiving the highest rating.
In response to a recommendation by the Commission, the SJC adopted an ordinance to improve fairness and objectivity of the annual
appraisal exercise.
The Supreme Judicial Council continued the monitoring of cases of high public interest for their celerity at trial stage. Out of fifty such cases, nine cases have reportedly resulted in conviction.
The SJC identified reasons for delays in some cases and issued follow-up recommendations, however, abusive delays in
some important cases continued.
During the second half of 2009, allegations of trade in influence and corruption in relation to senior judicial appointments involving members of the SJC were made public.
In response to the allegations, the SJC launched formal disciplinary proceedings against a number of magistrates. Two members of the SJC resigned from their posts under public pressure, and returned to the magistracy.
Before that, the SJC stated that both members had violated the magistrates' ethical code and requested their resignation. The lack of legal basis reportedly prevented the SJC from taking disciplinary measures against them.
As a response, the Minister of Justice presented a proposal for an amendment to the Judicial Systems Act which intends to strengthen the disciplinary responsibility of members of the Supreme Judicial Council.
Of at least thirty magistrates allegedly involved, seventeen magistrates resigned over allegations of trade in influence in this case.
Disciplinary proceedings were reportedly initiated against all magistrates suspected of trading in influence who applied for administrative positions, no matter whether they have been appointed or not.
The SJC's disciplinary proceedings resulted so far in seven demotions. As criminal proceedings were not initiated by the prosecution against any of the magistrates involved, the allegations could not be verified in substance.
After several public signals, the SJC launched an investigation into irregularities at a regional court. The report of the investigation which was adopted by the SJC in February revealed a number of serious shortcomings in the management of court.
Disciplinary and legal follow-up to the findings are pending.
The lack of accountability of the Chief Public Prosecutor was criticised by the European Court of Human Rights. The ECHR's ruling called on Bulgaria to install appropriate checks and balances among institutions in the judicial system.
Benchmark 4: Conduct and report on professional, non-partisan investigations into allegations of high-level corruption. Report on internal inspections of public institutions and on the publication of assets of high-level officials
As a follow-up to recommendations of the Commission, Bulgaria has created five additional standing joint teams to address key organised crime cases (see benchmark 6).
These teams have also been charged on a pilot basis with the investigation of allegations of fraud and negligence of official duties against three previous ministers and two Members of Parliament.
By the beginning of March, altogether six indictments involving two former ministers, two Members of Parliament and one former director of a state agency have been registered.
Bulgaria strengthened the capacity of the joint investigative team for the counteraction of EU fraud. Bulgaria reports that out of 125 cases under investigation by the team in 2009, 108 files were forwarded to court.
As a response to recommendations of the Commission, Bulgaria prepared amendments to the law on the prevention of conflicts of interest with a view to establishing a commission in charge of implementing the law under the supervision of Parliament.
It is expected that the establishment of a specialised commission would extend the limited scope of application of the conflict of interest law to other areas, improve its enforcement and increase its effectiveness through the application of sanctions or the forfeiture of assets.
A number of high level corruption cases are currently under investigation. Seven indictments have recently been registered but two important fraud cases before court still encounter severe delays.
No convictions in high level corruption cases have been reported since July 2009.
Insufficient controls at administrative level to prevent irregularities and detect administrative violations continue to be reported. In many cases, signals reach the judicial authorities before preliminary administrative checks are performed.
At the same time, administrative control bodies are not sufficiently pro-active to establish risks and to identify ex-officio possible cases of fraud and corruption.
Reforms which should lead to greater accountability and efficiency have been initiated at the National Revenue Agency and at the National Customs Agency.
The implementation of the Law on Prevention and Detection of Conflict of Interests reportedly led to the establishment of forty-seven cases of irregularities since mid 2009.
However, the publication of asset declarations of high-level officials, Ministers and Members of Parliament on a dedicated site of the National Audit Office has not been systematically updated nor was any follow-up by the control bodies in charge of verifying the declarations reported.
In addition, no follow-up to allegations of conflict of interest among high officials and Members of Parliament by a specially designated parliamentary committee has been reported since December 2009.
Benchmark 5: Take further measures to prevent and fight corruption, in particular at the borders and within local government
On 18 November 2009, the Council of Ministers adopted an ambitious strategy to prevent and combat corruption and organized crime, which would be implemented across the whole public sector with the help of an action plan and with foreign assistance.
Bulgaria should increase administrative efforts to prevent irregularities in public procurement and to follow-up concerns in the implementation of EU funds.
It will be important that the results of the Parliamentary discussion of amendments to the public procurement law ensure an effective protection against fraud and corruption in public procurement.
Benchmark 6: Implement a strategy to fight organised crime, focussing on serious crime, money laundering as well as on the systematic confiscation of assets of criminals. Report on new and ongoing investigations, indictments and convictions in these areas
In response to a recommendation by the Commission, Bulgaria established five permanent joint investigative teams under the direction of the Supreme Cassation Prosecution Office.
These teams are led by prosecutors and include investigative police officers, investigating magistrates and representatives of the State Agency for National Security (SANS), the latter in particular to collect financial intelligence.
The five teams will focus mainly on the investigation of important organised crime cases.
In response to another recommendation by the Commission, Bulgaria intends to substantially strengthen the legislation on the forfeiture of criminal assets and the mandate of the Commission for the Forfeiture of Criminal Assets (CEPACA).
Amendments include in particular: broadening of the definition of "related persons" whose assets could be seized, giving CEPACA the right to act ex-officio, assessing assets on the basis of their market value and a shift of the burden of proof when assets are suspected to have been acquired illegally.
The legal amendments focus on forfeiture by civil courts which would be independent of a specific decision in a criminal case but conditional upon a number of other elements such as specific criminal history.
It is expected that the draft will reach Parliament in March following public consultation.
Since mid-2009, Bulgaria carried out a number of arrests and launched investigations in connection with organised crime groups.
During the same period, two indictments in high-profile cases were filed, one for murder and for setting up an organized crime group and one for tax-evasion.
Substantial assets were frozen in the second case.
A possible witness in a high-profile organized crime-case was killed in Sofia on 5 January 2010. Organised crime cases in court have generally shown little development since mid-2009 and no convictions have been reported in this period.
Bulgaria considers strengthening the legal protection against money laundering through amendments to the notary's act which would prohibit cash payment for real estate transfers. The amendments are currently being discussed by Parliament.
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/cvm/docs/com_2010_112_en.pdf
During the last six months, Bulgaria has initiated several concrete proposals for reform which respond to recommendations made by the Commission: A partial revision of the Penal Procedure Code is currently under Parliamentary discussion and work is ongoing on a substantial reform of the Criminal Assets Forfeiture Act and on a revision of the Conflicts of Interest Law.
Bulgaria also decided to strengthen the structures of the prosecution in the fight against serious crime by using joint investigation teams for some priority cases involving high-level corruption and organised crime.
In addition, Bulgaria launched a structural reform of the National Revenue Agency and of the National Customs Agency and started to work on a comprehensive strategy to fight corruption and organised crime.
At the same time, the Inspectorate to the Supreme Judicial Council continued its good track record and the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) pursued the monitoring of cases of high public interest.
However, the judiciary continued to produce only few results in cases involving high-level corruption and organised crime and a further street killing occurred in January 2010.
Allegations of serious corruption related to senior appointments in the judiciary involving members of the SJC still need to be fully examined. A quicker and more complete administrative follow-up to the Commission's concerns regarding irregularities, conflict of interest and fraud in the implementation of EU funds needs to be implemented before the next assessment.
Benchmark 1: Adopt Constitutional amendments removing any ambiguity regarding the independence and accountability of the judicial system
The Inspectorate to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) continued to register a good track record of inspections.
The Inspectorate has conducted scheduled inspections of the whole Bulgarian judicial system with the exception of the Sofia Appellate
Region's civil branch. Although the Inspectorate's recommendations to courts and prosecutors' offices had not been consistently followed in all cases, the Inspectorate reported that the inspections produced overall a visible preventive effect among the magistrates.
The newly established joint working group of the SJC and the Inspectorate should contribute to the unification of disciplinary practice, assist in targeting inspections and in the application of inspection findings by the SJC to appraisal and appointment procedures.
Current practice shows that sanctions imposed by the SJC are often lenient. Some cases have also been dismissed due to the expiry of statutory deadlines.
Benchmark 2: Ensure a more transparent and efficient judicial process by adopting and implementing a new judicial system act and the new civil procedure code. Report on the impact of these new laws and of the penal and administrative procedure codes, notably on the pre- trial phase
In response to recommendations by the Commission, the government introduced several amendments to the Penal Procedure Code with a view to improving the efficiency and transparency of the judicial process. The debate in Parliament so far has shown that not all amendments may be supported.
Draft amendments to the Penal Code tabled by the Government aim to strengthen the sanctions for offences such as homicide, abduction and credit fraud.
Bulgaria provides a positive evaluation of the instrument of plea-bargaining which had led to increased judicial efficiency. On the other hand, the application of the expedited procedure had resulted in undue leniency in cases where the indictment was fully sustained by evidence.
As a result of the evaluation, the Bulgarian authorities consider excluding some serious criminal offences from the application of
the expedited procedure and aiming at limiting the court's ability to deliver judgments under the defined minimum.
No progress has been reported with procedures to adopt the new draft Statutory Instruments Act which should introduce clear rules for transparency and public debate and codify the different stages of the legislative process.
Benchmark 3: Continue the reform of the judiciary in order to enhance professionalism, accountability and efficiency. Evaluate the impact of this reform and publish the results annually
Appraisal of magistrates continued to be criticised as most magistrates were receiving the highest rating.
In response to a recommendation by the Commission, the SJC adopted an ordinance to improve fairness and objectivity of the annual
appraisal exercise.
The Supreme Judicial Council continued the monitoring of cases of high public interest for their celerity at trial stage. Out of fifty such cases, nine cases have reportedly resulted in conviction.
The SJC identified reasons for delays in some cases and issued follow-up recommendations, however, abusive delays in
some important cases continued.
During the second half of 2009, allegations of trade in influence and corruption in relation to senior judicial appointments involving members of the SJC were made public.
In response to the allegations, the SJC launched formal disciplinary proceedings against a number of magistrates. Two members of the SJC resigned from their posts under public pressure, and returned to the magistracy.
Before that, the SJC stated that both members had violated the magistrates' ethical code and requested their resignation. The lack of legal basis reportedly prevented the SJC from taking disciplinary measures against them.
As a response, the Minister of Justice presented a proposal for an amendment to the Judicial Systems Act which intends to strengthen the disciplinary responsibility of members of the Supreme Judicial Council.
Of at least thirty magistrates allegedly involved, seventeen magistrates resigned over allegations of trade in influence in this case.
Disciplinary proceedings were reportedly initiated against all magistrates suspected of trading in influence who applied for administrative positions, no matter whether they have been appointed or not.
The SJC's disciplinary proceedings resulted so far in seven demotions. As criminal proceedings were not initiated by the prosecution against any of the magistrates involved, the allegations could not be verified in substance.
After several public signals, the SJC launched an investigation into irregularities at a regional court. The report of the investigation which was adopted by the SJC in February revealed a number of serious shortcomings in the management of court.
Disciplinary and legal follow-up to the findings are pending.
The lack of accountability of the Chief Public Prosecutor was criticised by the European Court of Human Rights. The ECHR's ruling called on Bulgaria to install appropriate checks and balances among institutions in the judicial system.
Benchmark 4: Conduct and report on professional, non-partisan investigations into allegations of high-level corruption. Report on internal inspections of public institutions and on the publication of assets of high-level officials
As a follow-up to recommendations of the Commission, Bulgaria has created five additional standing joint teams to address key organised crime cases (see benchmark 6).
These teams have also been charged on a pilot basis with the investigation of allegations of fraud and negligence of official duties against three previous ministers and two Members of Parliament.
By the beginning of March, altogether six indictments involving two former ministers, two Members of Parliament and one former director of a state agency have been registered.
Bulgaria strengthened the capacity of the joint investigative team for the counteraction of EU fraud. Bulgaria reports that out of 125 cases under investigation by the team in 2009, 108 files were forwarded to court.
As a response to recommendations of the Commission, Bulgaria prepared amendments to the law on the prevention of conflicts of interest with a view to establishing a commission in charge of implementing the law under the supervision of Parliament.
It is expected that the establishment of a specialised commission would extend the limited scope of application of the conflict of interest law to other areas, improve its enforcement and increase its effectiveness through the application of sanctions or the forfeiture of assets.
A number of high level corruption cases are currently under investigation. Seven indictments have recently been registered but two important fraud cases before court still encounter severe delays.
No convictions in high level corruption cases have been reported since July 2009.
Insufficient controls at administrative level to prevent irregularities and detect administrative violations continue to be reported. In many cases, signals reach the judicial authorities before preliminary administrative checks are performed.
At the same time, administrative control bodies are not sufficiently pro-active to establish risks and to identify ex-officio possible cases of fraud and corruption.
Reforms which should lead to greater accountability and efficiency have been initiated at the National Revenue Agency and at the National Customs Agency.
The implementation of the Law on Prevention and Detection of Conflict of Interests reportedly led to the establishment of forty-seven cases of irregularities since mid 2009.
However, the publication of asset declarations of high-level officials, Ministers and Members of Parliament on a dedicated site of the National Audit Office has not been systematically updated nor was any follow-up by the control bodies in charge of verifying the declarations reported.
In addition, no follow-up to allegations of conflict of interest among high officials and Members of Parliament by a specially designated parliamentary committee has been reported since December 2009.
Benchmark 5: Take further measures to prevent and fight corruption, in particular at the borders and within local government
On 18 November 2009, the Council of Ministers adopted an ambitious strategy to prevent and combat corruption and organized crime, which would be implemented across the whole public sector with the help of an action plan and with foreign assistance.
Bulgaria should increase administrative efforts to prevent irregularities in public procurement and to follow-up concerns in the implementation of EU funds.
It will be important that the results of the Parliamentary discussion of amendments to the public procurement law ensure an effective protection against fraud and corruption in public procurement.
Benchmark 6: Implement a strategy to fight organised crime, focussing on serious crime, money laundering as well as on the systematic confiscation of assets of criminals. Report on new and ongoing investigations, indictments and convictions in these areas
In response to a recommendation by the Commission, Bulgaria established five permanent joint investigative teams under the direction of the Supreme Cassation Prosecution Office.
These teams are led by prosecutors and include investigative police officers, investigating magistrates and representatives of the State Agency for National Security (SANS), the latter in particular to collect financial intelligence.
The five teams will focus mainly on the investigation of important organised crime cases.
In response to another recommendation by the Commission, Bulgaria intends to substantially strengthen the legislation on the forfeiture of criminal assets and the mandate of the Commission for the Forfeiture of Criminal Assets (CEPACA).
Amendments include in particular: broadening of the definition of "related persons" whose assets could be seized, giving CEPACA the right to act ex-officio, assessing assets on the basis of their market value and a shift of the burden of proof when assets are suspected to have been acquired illegally.
The legal amendments focus on forfeiture by civil courts which would be independent of a specific decision in a criminal case but conditional upon a number of other elements such as specific criminal history.
It is expected that the draft will reach Parliament in March following public consultation.
Since mid-2009, Bulgaria carried out a number of arrests and launched investigations in connection with organised crime groups.
During the same period, two indictments in high-profile cases were filed, one for murder and for setting up an organized crime group and one for tax-evasion.
Substantial assets were frozen in the second case.
A possible witness in a high-profile organized crime-case was killed in Sofia on 5 January 2010. Organised crime cases in court have generally shown little development since mid-2009 and no convictions have been reported in this period.
Bulgaria considers strengthening the legal protection against money laundering through amendments to the notary's act which would prohibit cash payment for real estate transfers. The amendments are currently being discussed by Parliament.
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/cvm/docs/com_2010_112_en.pdf
-
Print
-
Send via email
- Translate to
-
Share:
Comments
To post comments, please, Login or Register.
Please read the The Sofia Echo forum comments policy.
EC report calls for further movement on reform of Bulgarian judiciary, law enforcement
Bulgaria should take steps to further improve judicial practice and the way the judiciary, police and other investigative bodies are structured, managed and co-operate, the report said.
Bulgaria has 'strong reform momentum' against crime - European Commission
Still too few cases are concluded in court, EC says in its report on Bulgaria's Co-operation and Verification Mechanism on justice and home affairs
Bulgaria signed 1.4 billion leva public procurement contracts in H1 2010
The value of public procurement contracts signed in the first half of 2010 was 1.5 billion leva less than in H1 2009.
Bulgarian President vetoes Penal Procedure Code amendments
The introduction of the figure of the substitute lawyer and undercover agents being allowed to testify in anonymity among the amendments rejected by Purvanov.
Radical justice
A lot of ‘ifs’ in the final amendments to the Penal Procedure Code
Harsher penalties for kidnappers adopted
The changes come a day after the EC said that Bulgaria had launched a number of important initiatives that are testament to its will for reform
Bulgaria’s Foreign Ministry welcomes ‘co-operation’ in European Commission report
The European Commission report on the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism with Bulgaria ‘faithfully reflects both progress and the need for further progress’ in fulfilling the benchmarks for reform in the fight against organised crime and corruption, Foreign Ministry says.
EU lauds Bulgaria's will for reform but slams judiciary
The report, on the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism, refers to the continuously poor results of the judicial system to investigate, prosecute and try cases of high-level corruption and organised crime.
Bulgarians arrested smuggling cigarettes in Italy worth 2.36M euro
Two Bulgarian lorry drivers were arrested in Italy for smuggling cigarettes into the country from Greece.
Veliko Turnovo police chief suspended
Milen Manolov has been temporarily suspended pending a check for alleged disciplinary violations
Bulgarian police busts VAT draining scheme
Six people have been arrested in Petrich and Sofia with offices and homes raided
EC report: happy with Bulgaria's momentum, but not pace, in reforming judiciary
The EC will continue monitoring Bulgaria once all the benchmarks it set has set have been satisfactorily fulfilled.
Barroso congratulates Borissov
European Commission President sends signal about Bulgaria’s need for reforms, pledges assistance to Borissov administration.
More in this category
Saab awarded $2.4M military training equipment contract in Bulgaria
The funding is provided under the foreign military sales programme of the US army's Program Executive Office of Simulation, Training and Instrumentation.
Two Brits fined for hooliganism in Bulgaria’s Veliko Turnovo
The UK nationals were arrested after throwing beer bottles at people after being refused entry to a restaurant that had closed for the night.
Tourism: Bulgaria to spend 300M leva on restoring castles, ancient sites
Restoration and development projects include Madara Horseman, Arbanassi fortress, Magura cave.
Sovereign Order of Malta assists hospital in Bulgaria’s Iskrets
Simeon Saxe-Coburg and his spouse Margarita opened a new heating and insulation system at the Tsar Ferdinand Hospital for Pulmonary Diseases in Iskrets, a project implemented thanks to the Embassy of the Sovereign Order of Malta in Sofia and the Nando Peretti Foundation.
Bulgarian Parliament passes confiscation act
According to the law's provisions, the commission will have the power to investigate individuals without prior notification and would not require a criminal conviction in order to launch an investigation.
© 2000-2012, Sofia Echo Media Ltd.
Web Design by RIZN
Sofia Echo Media is part of the Economedia Group.
The news and information content on this website is provided by our editorial team and is copyrighted.
Any unauthorised reproduction or use of it is strictly forbidden. Reproduction of this website's content is permitted only
with prior written permission from the Editor-in-Chief, should be propertly acredited and provide an active link back to our site.
Comments posted by the website's visitors are independent of the editorial materials and do not represent the views of sofiaecho.com.
Sofia Echo Media cannot be held responsible for the statements contained in visitor comments.
The percentаge change in the shares' prices are based on the price of the last transaction of the current session compared to the
price of the last transaction of the previous session. Bulgarian Stock Exchange data is not real-time, but updated every 15 minutes,
and should not be used as a basis for decisions about buying or selling stock options.
- Economedia Group portfolio:
- In Bulgarian:
-
Business:
Капитал,
Кариери,
Пазари,
Ho Re Mag,
Регал,
Градът.bg,
Одит,
Foton.bg,
Online shop
- News: Дневник, Европа, Foreign Policy - България
- IT: IDG.BG, Computerworld, PC World, CIO, Networkworld
- Entertainment: Бакхус
-
In English:
The Sofia Echo
whether is valeri or valley ray,please enough of your childish comments.Resolve your inner conflicts please.Bulgaria needs to change for the benefit of its people,feudal times are of the past..
Why is this anyone's business. We should be able to do whatever we want in Bulgaria. There are some things that are worse in other places where I have been, and I have been all over, even to the USA. Look at the bad in other places, and not in Bulgaria. We are never at fault here. It is mostly the foriegners that are causing all the trouble.