FAMOUS FOREBEAR: Christopher Parrish is proud of Gladstone’s reforms.
Photo: Gabriel Hershman
FURY: Gladstone unleashed a tidal wave of invective against the Turks.
Photo: Utopia Portrait Gallery
"Let me endeavour, very briefly to sketch, in the rudest outline what the Turkish race was and what it is. It is not a question of Mohammedanism simply, but of Mohammedanism compounded with the peculiar character of a race. They are not the mild Mohammedans of India, nor the chivalrous Saladins of Syria, nor the cultured Moors of Spain. They were, upon the whole, from the black day when they first entered Europe, the one great anti-human specimen of humanity."
Was this "racist" anti-Islamic tirade delivered by Geert Wilders or Nick Griffin, a warning of the "danger" of Turkish entry to the European Union, perhaps? Wrong context, wrong speakers, wrong century. Undeniably, however, it’s an understatement to say it is politically incorrect – in today’s terms.
The speaker – or orator would be more apt in this case – was one of Britain’s most venerated statesmen, William Ewart Gladstone (1809-1898), on the occasion of the violent repression by the Ottomans of the April uprising in Bulgaria in 1876.
Gladstone, who was prime minister four times and was still in Downing Street when he was 84, a feat no British prime minister has equalled, was one of two titanic figures – the other being Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881) – who presided over Victorian politics.
The crushing of the rebellion against the Ottomans in 1876 led to the slaughter of about 30 000 Bulgarians, the worst atrocities being committed at Panagyurishte, Peroushtitsa, Bratzigovo and Batak. News of the massacres, famously reported by American scholar Eugene Schuyler, soon reached London, provoking questions in parliament about Disraeli’s support for Turkey. It soon became the subject of a fierce disagreement between the two statesmen.
Gladstone and Disraeli disliked each other intensely. And that, I venture to suggest in an interview with Gladstone’s great-great-grandson, Christopher Parrish, is one of the motivations behind Gladstone’s speech, delivered when Disraeli was prime minister (Queen Victoria, incidentally, adored her darling "Izzy") and when Disraeli’s Tory government was supporting Turkey at a time of intense international rivalry with Russia.
Parrish is a robust 72-year-old with red cheeks and eyebrows to rival British politician Denis Healey’s. His voice has a clarity of diction and melody which might just – if one closed one’s eyes – give one an insight into the powerful oratory of his illustrious ancestor more than a century ago. Parrish was in Bulgaria, his first visit here, to attend a conference at the New Bulgarian University marking the 200th anniversary of Gladstone’s birth.
Progressive Gladstone, unlike most politicians who started out on the left and veer to the right, moved the other way. He began as a Tory but by the end of his rule he was considered a progressive. He even – sharp intake of breath – supported extending the vote to women, a revolutionary idea at the end of the 19th century.
"The old party system broke up in the middle of the 19th century and there was a major realignment based on free trade. He developed liberal ideas, particularly on education – meaning progressive, not reactionary views," says Parrish.
"Gladstone always pursued a rather independent line. He had an almost God-like sense of mission, something he believed gave him an edge over those seeking fairy temporary advantage."
In 1876 Gladstone was languishing in opposition, four years before his return to power. According to Parrish, Disraeli’s foreign policy was guided by realpolitik and, in this case, that meant picking the right side in the rivalry between Turkey and Russia: "Specifically, the government didn’t want Russia to obtain an outlet to the Mediterranean and that meant keeping the Turks in power. If you took the side of the Bulgarians, you were going against Turkey and inviting the Russians in. So (Gladstone’s view) was regarded as a very dangerous policy – and it probably was – but it was presented with such flair and fire that the government was outdone."
Gladstone’s speech was written down in a pamphlet that sold about 300 000 copies. His attack on Turkey went down well in Bulgaria, where he is still a venerated figure with a school and street in Sofia named in his honour. "I met a splendid man at the conference, Professor Angel Stankov, a renowned musician. He was very proud of living in Gladstone Street. I said at the beginning of my speech it was wonderful to come to a country where Gladstone was almost universally admired," Parrish says.
A very good and perceptive article - well done to the journalist concerned.
The only aspect of Gladstone's public activities that is (perhaps unsurprisingly) not covered is his one-man night-time mission through the streets of London to rescue fallen "working girls". No direct suggestion of any impropriety - then or now - but he certainly pursued this spare-time task with some vigour over the years.
Zeynep, it is truly idiotic comment. Learn the ABC of history. Bulgaria and Turkey were in fact allies in the First World War, and they both fought against Russia. Two million Turks massacred in Bulgaria!!!? Pure invention.
Well at least it can be said that the Bulgarians got their own back. During the first world war the Bulgarians massacred 2 million Turks. Of course Bulgaria was not the only country. The are millions unaccounted Turks which disappeared from Eastern block countries, not to mention that the Armenians did there fair share.
This is the unrecognised holocaust. So its genocide if your Christian and Jewish and just part of war if your anything else.
At the corner of Gladstone Street and Kniaz Boris Street is the Yellow Cafe, a meeting point for the local lottery fans. If you go there on a Thursday, the day of the lottery draw, you may see a guy filling in his lottery slip with the help of a conical weight tied to a thread. He holds the thread in one hand and swings the weight backward and forward until it hits a number on his slip. He puts a cross on each of the numbers
LIKE James Bourchier, the British journalist who won a place in the hearts of Bulgarians by his advocacy of their cause as they sought their own destiny as the Ottoman Empire crumbled, Januarius MacGahan earned himself a place in Bulgaria's history by his forthright reporting of one of its most traumatic episodes.
A very good and perceptive article - well done to the journalist concerned.
The only aspect of Gladstone's public activities that is (perhaps unsurprisingly) not covered is his one-man night-time mission through the streets of London to rescue fallen "working girls". No direct suggestion of any impropriety - then or now - but he certainly pursued this spare-time task with some vigour over the years.
Zeynep, it is truly idiotic comment. Learn the ABC of history. Bulgaria and Turkey were in fact allies in the First World War, and they both fought against Russia. Two million Turks massacred in Bulgaria!!!? Pure invention.
Well at least it can be said that the Bulgarians got their own back. During the first world war the Bulgarians massacred 2 million Turks. Of course Bulgaria was not the only country. The are millions unaccounted Turks which disappeared from Eastern block countries, not to mention that the Armenians did there fair share.
This is the unrecognised holocaust. So its genocide if your Christian and Jewish and just part of war if your anything else.