A woman with three kids of my relatives were killed in the bath by Cyprus Greek before Cyprus Greek-Turkish War! Two nationed and equal conditions/rights are necessarary for the peace on the island ...

Why not keep the island divided forever? It's like any other place where two nations share geographical location and share a border.
Why would UK and the US even be part of any discussion there?
If the issue is of such imporance as to involve such far away countries, why not invite say Brazil an Japan?

THE GREEK CYPRIOT MUST FIRST GET OFF THEIR HIGH HORSE.FORGET GREECE AND STOP THINKING OF THE TURKISH CYPRIOT AS A GOAT HERDER BUT AS AN EQUAL. ONLY THEN CAN THEY LIVE TOGETHER.

I firmly support Capt's Frangelakis
analysis except for the ones referring to Turkey's well being
Frangelakis hopefully forgot and not ignored the fact that Turkey is ruled according to the kemalist diction and its political decisions are scrutinized by the
board of Generals.

Turkey desires a five party summit over Cyprus because it has the support of both the US and the UK. It also knows that Greece is susceptible to pressure from both those two countries. A five party summit in reality means a gang of 4 attempting to bully Cyprus into giving up its territory and sovereignty to its neighbour who has illegally occupied the northern third of that island for over 35 years in complete disregard to international law, UN resolutions, and human rights.

the turkey is indeed the big problem of this area. Greek and Turkish Cypriots should UNITE and demand that the EU demilitarise all of Cyprus and form a 'one country' power sharing government and let the people eat olive and cheese and enjoy their lives without Ottoman aspirations getting in the way.

Just received the information that Cyprus will veto Turkey in december. The one option to avoid it would be for Ankara to open its ports and aiports to Cyprus according to the protocol they signed 5 years ago... This time Turkey will be punished.

Turkey's FM Davutoglu wants Ankara to play a strong regional role in the area, not dissimilar to that played by the old Ottoman Empire. Good for our friends in Ankara, but they should do it in a way that promotes the long-term interests of the Turkish people rather than the short-term interests of the US and Britain. America wants Turkey to influence Iran and to work together with Israel on defence issues such as air strikes (something any Muslim country worth its salt should think twice about, given that training the Israeli air force to strike targets in the West Bank and Gaza may not be considered very Islamic). The United States is also pushing France and Germany to accept Turkey as a full EU member, and the UK, which believes that it can best promote its interests by acting as America's can-do ally, is attempting to use its influence to force Athens and Nicosia to solve the Cyprus issue and remove an obstacle to Turkey's EU entry. Britain and the United States should know better, however, than to force solutions that do not reflect justice and fairness, because they won't last. The best way to solve the Cyprus issue is to let the Greek and Turkish Cypriots hammer out a solution without interference from Ankara or Athens. Turkey however wants to maintain a presence in Cyprus for a number of reasons and is calling for a five-side peace conference. Although the security of Turkish Cypriots is paramount, letting outsiders decide the future of Cyprus is not the way forward and won't be accepted by the Government in Nicosia, which whether our American, British and Turkish friends like it or not, has a say in the future of Cyprus and also has the right to veto Turkish entry into the EU (not that it want to, as good relations with a stable and prosperous Ankara are in its interests) but it doesn't make sense trying to bully Nicosia into something that won't ensure future stability and contentment for all on the island. Any ideas that Turkish officials may have of allowing colonists to remain permanently on Cyprus seems to go against the grain of achieving a permanent peace on the island as it will upset not only the Greek Cypriots but also the indigenous Turkish Cypriots, who grateful as they may be to Ankara for its help and support since 1974, don't want to see themselves flooded with colonists from eastern Turkey. In short, therefore, and I hope our Turkish friends appreciate that I am speaking as a firm friend and admirer of the Turkish people and their history, a stable peace on Cyprus and the Aegean will allow Turkey to reach its diplomatic and trade potential in other areas such as the Caucasus and in the south-east. The strange thing is that Greece and Cyprus actually welcome a strong, stable Turkey playing a positive role in the region -- but the quid pro quo must be a fair settlement in Cyprus and the Aegean, and allowing the tiny Greek minority in Istanbul (it was their city before after all) freedom to flourish (Greeks from Turkey can be very loyal Turkish subjects if they are treated fairly). Of course, the Greek and Cypriot sides will listen to any reasonable and fair Turkish requests but it seems to me that at the moment, despite the positive noises coming from Mr Papandreou and Mr Erdogan, the wills of the Turkish and Greek people for lasting peace should be respected by war-mongers because they are (believe it or not) in Turkey's interest as well as Greece's. May God inspire our political leaders so that the people of the region can focus on economic development, cooperation and environmental issues, while also reducing their ridiculously high defence bills. May God the peace maker inspire us all.

the turkey is the big problem of this area.