Sat, Feb 11 2012
European External Action Service, foreseen in the EU’s Lisbon Treaty, should be subject to democratic oversight by the European Parliament, MEPs say in a resolution approved on October 22 2009.
Sweden, current holder of the European Union presidency, is working with Czech authorities on an opt-out on some provisions of the Lisbon Treaty to open the way for president Vaclav Klaus to sign it.
‘The train has already travelled so fast and so far that I guess it will not be possible to stop it or turn it around, however much we would wish to,’ Klaus says in an interview in Prague, adding he will not wait for the UK elections.
Iranian silver-plated pigeons, African leopard skins and a Chinese bronze yak were among the 70 items sold in an auction of gifts presented to Romania’s former dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife Elena.
Airports were also showing signs of better co-ordination and providing passengers with accurate real-time information, compared to previous period of travel disruption, transport commissioner Siim Kallas said.
Viktor Orban defends government's record, new constitution in state-of-the-nation address as he slams European Commission.
PM Donald Tusk invited authors, NGOs, experts and bloggers to a debate on the ACTA copyright agreement, but several key organisations, including the Helsinki Foundation, rejected the invitation claiming that the talks will likely offer no opportunity to discuss concrete issues.
'Dirty Jews' and 'Dirty Nazis' were the most popular chants when two groups clashed in front of Új Színház (New Theatre)
I seem to recall, "Working Man In England", that the British government let down the Czechs rather badly in 1938, when a man called Neville Chamberlain masquerading as British Prime Minister gave up the Czech border territories (known as the Sudetenland) to a man called Adolf Hitler masquerading as German Chancellor, in what became known as the "Munich Agreement".
Doubtless from the Czech viewpoint now, "Revenge is a Dish Best Served Cold".....
Dear Friend
Liberty requires freedom - the EU brings the chains of dictatorship. If you doubt this, investigate for yourself the content of the Lisbon Treaty. Do this for yourself, challenge yourself to find out what the Treaty actually means, and then by all means, if you agree, wholeheartedly with its content, then fully support it. However, if you find its content will reduce your liberty, your freedom, your right to life, then stand against it.
This comment has been removed by the moderator because it contained реклама & спам
I meant "expected". ;-)
Just like I accepted, the Czech government has adopted Klaus's demands as their own, thinking that it is the most feasible way to continue in the process. They will table them in the EU soon.
http://euobserver.com/9/28812
The government wants to believe that Klaus won't have further demands if they win the concessions - which, so far, they have not been promised.
At any rate, there is surely no constitutional crisis in Czechia stemming from this question.
It is with the treaty of Lisbon, that the EU states finally get an explicit right to depart from the EU.
The supposed "eurosceptics" that have been posting here, supposedly both hate the EU -- but they oppose this modification that will finally, FINALLY allow the United Kingdom (or the Czech Republic or any other nation) to leave it.
By stalling the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, the President of the Czech Republic is merely prolonging the enslavement of his nation to the *previous* treaties -- those treaties that allowed no [...]
Read the full comment withdrawal from the European Union at all.
So it all depends on this question: Do you want a Lisbon Treaty EU with every nation having the right to withdraw from it, or do you want the current EU with no nation having the right to leave it?
do you want to be part of a Europe that has clout, of be the little nations that China and India will dictate to? With the world power changing, Europeans, including the english must ensure a future for their generations to come. the lisbon treaty does not override national soverignity, so please read through it first before judging
I would like to remind my Czech friends of the other European political movements that thought it was in mankinds interest to "unify" Europe without a democratic mandate:
Fascism
Communism
Socialism
national Socialism
The EU will prove to be a bigger threat to peace than all of the above put together.
I beg the Czech people & President to resist this EU tyranny - all is lost without you.
As an Englishman [...]
Read the full comment I will say this:
No Democracy? No Ballot Box? - NO PEACE.
Fight the power - the Franco / German EU Empire must fall!
We are relying on your President to delay until June 2010. Brave, Proud and Handsome People of the Czech Republic, you came to our aid in 1939. Please help us again to throw out this hideous piece of totalitarianism that is threatening to extinguish our freedom.
Reader Rob completely misunderstands what democracy is all about. Indeed, the goal of the presidential elections is to find someone such that there is "no one better". And sometimes such a choice is not achieved immediately, by communist-style unanimous votes, but after 3rd or 4th round. Democracy chooses the representatives among the people, not among Gods, altough Klaus is pretty close to the latter, anyway. Everything else in Rob's comment is just an irrational paranoia and doesn't deserve further discussions.
After having lived here for 8 years, I can tell you that there is no such thing as a constitutional crisis, due to the fact that the Czech "constitution" doesnt really support democracy in any way whatsoever. The parliamentary elections AND the presidential elections are NOT democratic at all. Prague reeks of cronyism and corruption, with Mr. Klaus at the helm. This man "won" both of his Parliamnet appointments solely due to the fact that they could find no one better. He had to, humiliatingly, "win" election on the 3rd and 4th votes. So when Klaus acts as though he [...]
Read the full comment has some kind of mandate, he doesnt, he doesnt at all. And the "polls" that are held in the Czech Republic are about as scientific as the rhythm method is for contraception.
The comments about a looming "constitutional crisis" in Czechia is simply misinformation.
Except for 4 green deputies (who will not be elected again, polls indicate), everyone has said that they don't intend to fire the president and the president is acting exactly as the constitution expects. For example, social democracy just backed the president. No open disagreement can be expected because 91% of the Czech citizens, according to TV polls, think that Klaus's condition is justified.
Some people may disagree with Klaus but it's absurd to suggest that he is doing any [...]
Read the full comment wrongdoing. A constitutional crisis would mean a disagreement who has the competences to do various things: there is surely no such disagreement in the Czech Republic today.
It may be expected that the Czech government will accept Klaus's demands and take them as their own, too. What may have happened is that the previous governments were negotiating in the EU in a sloppy way, so our foreign policy failed in this sense.
However, that can't change the fact that Klaus ratifies international treaties and he has the right to do every single thing he is doing. I am sure that various EU "federal" politicians find the attitude of the Czech Republic inconvenient. But the EU officials here are to serve the citizens, not the other way around.