Tue, Feb 09 2010
Photo: Krassimir Yuskesseliev
By posting a comment, you are deemed to have read and agreed to our
Acceptable Use Policy.
The motion was proposed by the Order, Law and Justice party and was supported by ruling party GERB, ultra-nationalist Ataka party and the right-wing Blue Coalition.
The former monarch and prime minister received the forests through the post-communist restitution process, but the state claims he got more than his due
Bulgaria’s former monarch Simeon Saxe-Coburg is quickly selling off forests he got under the country’s post-communist restitution process, a newspaper alleges, after the state said it would go to court to get some of the forests back.
Bulgaria had to have a nominee for the post, and Saxe-Coburg was one of the few people in Bulgaria worthy of it, former foreign minister Passi says.
It was later alleged that during the restitution, about 452ha of forests near the town of Samokov were transferred to the former royal family without any grounds for it.
First time the ratio of former collaborators is above 10 percent of records examined.
Weather conditions in Bulgaria on February 10-11 will become 'forbidding' according to the forecast.
260 Bulgarian soldiers landed at Sofia Airport from Kandahar on February 8 2010.
Having chosen its contestant to go to Oslo for Eurovision 2010, on February 28 Bulgaria will choose the song that he will sing.
Up to 90cm of snow cover in the region between Kurdzhali and Assenovgrad, while near Adrino snow cover is more than 70cm
Now I'm no expert on Bulgarian history but from what I've heard, they needed someone to act as the 'King of Bulgaria' and found this guy, a drunkard in a pub and told him he was now the King of Bulgaria. I'm sure this guy thought he was dreaming but then woke up and it was all real and now being passed down to his desendents, one being Saxe- Coburg. IS he the true monarch of Bulgaria or just the desendend of some guy picked out of a bar to rule a nation without a king or leader and just hand him the keys to the kingdom and now his desendents feel this right of intitlement. it just seems wrong to this Ex-Pat but what do I know? I suppose nothing
Hoosier: Who failed whom? Did he fail the nation by trying to drag it kicking and screaming into the western democracies; or did the nation fail him by not giving him support at citizen level?
At least he made an effort, which is more than can be said for 99% of the politicians. I would rather have a leader who tries and possibly fails, than a leader who does nothing.
Why should he not be like all of the rest of the people in power. So many people had hope in him, and he failed them.
If the land in question once belonged to his family then as I understand the laws he (as the acting head of the family) is entitled to have the land returned
to him. If there was an error and too much land, or land which was not rightly his, was given to him then either ask him to return it oor go to court and force him to rreturn the excess property. Based on what I have read he is willing tto return any lands given to him in error or which he is not eentiteld to without contesting the court.
Providing he acted in good faith when applying to have the land restituted back, I don't really see how they can claim it back.
So what!!!
He has as much right to have his property back as any other citizen - no more and no less. The Forestry Agency is also acting correctly if they feel there has been an error - they file a claim in the proper way. He has already publicly stated that he will accept any such decision without reservation.
As for any 'claim' made by unnamed sources - liberally sprinkled with the escape word of 'alleged' - I should give that the same weight at the communist referendum to abolish the monarchy - a weight equal to a small white feather!!
Personally I think he should never have been Prime Minister. Not because he was good or bad, but because he should have used his popularity at that time as a politically neutral but involved ex-King. Lets be frank here, the european league table of stable democratic nations are headed by constitutional monarchies.