Sat, Feb 11 2012
The tone of celebration that was attempted in hailing 2008 as the Year of Russia in Bulgaria and this year as the counterpoint Year of Bulgaria in Russia is ringing rather hollow. Not only did Russia feel no qualms about leaving Bulgaria in the cold, quite literally, amid its dispute with Ukraine that led to the cutoff of gas supplies in January, but also Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin declined to grace Bulgarian President Georgi Purvanov’s energy forum with his presence.
It is reassuring to see that most people surveyed in a snap poll about the Cabinet’s declaration of a "state of crisis" in the handling of Sofia’s refuse saw the move as nothing more than a political stunt.
Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani will meet President Purvanov and Prime Minister Stanishev during an official visit scheduled for April 14 and 15
The performance of the Government in actual delivery of assistance – money and equipment – and in aiding recovery in the coming months must be kept under the most careful scrutiny.
Debate should be democratic, indeed, but it also should be rational and factual.
In police work, bad tip-offs happen; who knows what the police were expecting? But that is no excuse for excessive use of force.
The country needs unity and inspiration around specific goals and Plevneliev has put forward specific numbers that he wants to see achieved.
It is to be hoped that 2012 will see Bulgaria tie up the loose end of not yet being a member of the European Union’s Schengen visa zone.
Dear Clive,
I would like to have your opinion, if it's journalistically possible (or even personally, by mail) on a question that I always kept concerning the integration of Bulgaria in the European Union.
It's clear by now that the standards of the Bulgarian Integration have brought two major developments for the country: One, it spreads the market opportunities for local corrupt forces and terror brigades (the so-called Mafia businesses) to some other countries and two, it fuels economically some of the planned development of Bulgaria's infrastructures. Although the point One was [...]
Read the full comment extremelly successful for the Organized Crime, it is clear as well that the influence of the this individuals has caused dramatic reductions and even stoppage on the attribution of communitary funds.
All in all, the benefits have gone to the wrong side of the law, while the hard working countrymen are seeing their tobacco production reduced, the limits imposed on the Wine Producion are dreadful for the producers (who won't have a market to sell, afterall) and the Quality of Life of the Bulgarians has already started to decrease drastically since 2007 (and will so, exponentially, until 2014). With the decrease of the quality of life and the expressionism of the inflation, the Foreign Investment that we conquered in the last two years will move out of Bulgaria (because, as we all know, Bulgaria won't be a low-cost country anymore: Just a country with low wages and low quality of life).
Summing it all up, what's in there for the Average Bulgarian, non-Crime profiting to be integrated in the European Union? How will the Euro Adoption (which is wide known as an inflation exploder) provide extra for the Nation?
Just because every "civilized" country has decided to act this way, is it fair to generalize and sell cheaply this notion to the Bulgarians that "if it worked in other countries, it will work here too"?
Or the preement need for change and internal reestructurization of Bulgaria should be put first and the house should be properly cleant and arranged so that we can take the next step to the Western Culture Adoption?
I truly believe that Bulgaria has it's own resource to grow in itself before joining this train, if doing so will make us join it as a well-governed, improving country instead of the poorest, *lesser* country of the EU.
More than an economic step, it's a necessary, honorable milestone for the Bulgarian individuals to overcome their own difficulties first in order to fully profit from the EU integration.
May we please have your point of view on this? Maybe as an Opinion article, where it will do no harm to your journalistic posture.
Sincerely,
D .